Tuesday, 22 October 2024 Home About Us Contact Us |
|
|
|
You are here:
Home
Articles
An interesting article containing a viewpoint from Sri Lanka regarding mass vaccination campaigns by the World health Organization.
The rubella vaccine scam - WHO is infecting the country while the government is busy fighting the LTTE You can view details of that incident here.
It should be noted without malice that clearly, they have worked out that Mr de Silva is not the smartest cog, (as demonstrated during his handling of the peace negotiations with the LTTE during which, that rogue Anton Balasingham nearly achieved Elam!), in the current government wheel that seems to be doing a splendid job in fighting the war as well as in undertaking development tasks to the extent it is feasible. Pay attention to this bit, as this is the best part of the article:
A little publicised, strange, fact is that the exact opposite to the avowed aim of the vaccination program is occurring after nearly 40 years of vaccination; young adult women in their childbearing years currently have the highest rate of rubella incidence, with a high in 1999 of 49% among persons aged 20 to 29 years, and CRS cases also have increased. In the meantime, the susceptibility rate of under 10 year olds has remained the same as in the pre-vaccine era. You may want to check other articles on this site establishing that antibody production on its own (the basis upon which vaccines are marketed) is not representative of the entirety and complexity of the immune process.
Any early benefit of vaccination also appears to wane from infancy, making the vaccinated young women more susceptible to the disease when they need immunity the most. Yet, natural immunity in early childhood appears to provide protection for a lifetime. Contracting these illnesses in childhood provides natural long term immunity, since both the cellular and humoral (the antibody producing part) aspects of immunity are involved collectively and interdependently. vaccination is an artificial method, and leads only to a limited artificial (humoral) response that does not equate to protection from the disease since in most outbreaks, many, if not most people getting the disease are already vaccinated.
The core issue here is that Mr Siripala de Silva seems to have a conflict of interest between his ministerial responsibilities as a national health law and policy maker, and the global policy and programs he is required to push through his WHO position. In this particular case, he has given the President wrong and dangerous advice on an issue that has caused the unnecessary death of a 12 year old girl (who by the way, is an only child ). Source: LankaWeb
Link to this article: Show: HTML Link Full Link Short Link
Related Articles:
You must be registered and logged in to comment. |
|
|