|Saturday, 25 May 2019 Home About Us Contact Us|
You are here:
The following are a series of questions put to the CDC as part of a report on the mercury, vaccines, autism issue. The report can be read here:
These are the questions for which no response was received from the CDC:
3. Dr. Boyd Haley is the chairman of the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky. He told us on camera concerning the CDC,
I don't trust them. I have met them. I know they have very little respect for hard biological science. Epidemiological studies can prove a possible connection, but they can't prove cause and effect. With the bio chemistry that has been done, the cell biology, we have done about everything we can do to show these kids (autistics) are mercury toxic&
What is the CDC's response to Dr. Haley's claim?
From: B.E. Haley/Medical Veritas 2 (2005) 535-542 535
Therefore, the lack of mercury in the birth hair of autistics strongly implies that they cannot effectively excrete mercury most likely by not being able to effectively couple Hg2+ with glutathione. Research by Dr. Jill James of the University of Arkansas has partially explained this phenomenon by demonstrating that autistics are quite low in glutathione, the sequester of mercury that exists intracellular and used by the body in the normal excretion process.
From: Neuroendocrinology Letters Vol.26 No.5, October 2005 Copyright © 2005 Neuroendocrinology Letters ISSN 0172-780X www.nel.edu mercury and autism: Accelerating Evidence? Joachim Mutter, Johannes Naumann, Rainer Schneider, Harald Walach & Boyd Haley
The process of cysteine and glutathione synthesis, which are crucial for natural mercury detoxification, are reduced in autistic children, possibly due to genetic polymorphisms [13,30]. Therefore, autistics have 20% lower plasma levels of cysteine and 54% lower levels of glutathione, which, among others, adversely affect their ability to detoxify and excrete metals like mercury [13,31]. This may lead to higher Hg concentrations in tissues like the nervous system and lead also to a longer halflife of mercury, compared with children with normal levels of cysteine and glutathione [13,18].
4. Would the CDC be willing to engage in a dialog with Haley about this issue? Showing the CDC and his findings side by side? Throughout our entire interview, he expressed the desire to talk with CDC. Would the CDC consider it?
7. In the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons,Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2006, The Geiers have a study showing downward trends in Neurodevelopmental Disorders following the removal of thimerosal in vaccines, here is a portion. What is your response?
A twophase study was undertaken to evaluate trends in diagnosis of new NDs entered into the vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the California Department of Developmental Services (CDDS) databases on a reporting quarter basis, from 1994 through 2005. Significant increasing trends in newly diagnosed NDs were observed in both databases 1994 through mid2002. Significant decreasing trends in newly diagnosed NDs were observed in both databases from mid2002through 2005. The results indicate that the trends in newly diagnosed NDs correspond directly to the expansion and subsequent contraction of the cumulative mercury dose to which children were exposed from TCVs through the U.S. Immunization schedule.
8. Dr. Frank Engley is a retired Professor of Microbiology at the University of Missouri. He has severed on various Microbiology Committees and Panels, and in the consulting capacity for CDC, NASA, FDA, EPA, and many others. In an on camera interview he told us, concerning thimerosal:
The CDC was in on the production and development of some of these vaccines. The CDC cannot afford to admit thimerosal is toxic because they have been promoting it for several years. Today they are in the process of getting vaccines all over the world to immunize 100 million children with vaccines many of which contain thimerosal. So the CDC cannot admit it is a problem...I am afraid they have a tremendous amount of pressure being brought to bare by the medical profession, by the pediatricians, by congress, and by industry, and so they are under pressure&and someday they will have to live with the fact with what they said is wrong. Today it is difficult to fight it. Because all these people that they buy, and pay, to do this work&and sometimes you wonder about where these people come from as far as their knowing what is good right and proper. I won't bring up religion because that has nothing to do with it&but knowing what is right and what is wrong and being able to admit it. The prejudges for these people are being forced to say something sometimes they really don't believe. But they are having to say it. I am not sure I can live long enough to see a lot of that taken away from them. I can only hope.
What is the CDC's response to Dr. Engley's claims?
9. Do Pharmaceutical companies have bigger influence today than they used to?
10. Can the American public have complete faith in the CDC and vaccine makers?
11. Why should the public believe doctors on the vaccines committees in charge of studies concerning vaccines? Why shouldn't the public question neutrality? This can be seen with the current study with The New England Journal of medicine.
Here is a portion from page 11:
Supported by the CDC.
12. Do you consider your studies unbiased and independent despite conflicts of interests listed such as the NEJM study?
An added question through email:
14. Has the CDC considered studying populations that don't vaccinate?
Link to this article: Show: HTML Link Full Link Short Link
You must be registered and logged in to comment.